CONNECT WITH US
Comments from readers
Monica Chen, Taipei; Joseph Tsai, DIGITIMES Asia
Friday 28 September 2007
  • Posted on Oct 30, 04:35

    and the prices are quite challenging I say...
  • Posted on Oct 2, 22:44

    Four cores are great if you are doing DVD encoding or Photoshop etc..
    Also multitasking you can have 4 different processor intensive programs running, 1 on each core and not have to worry about crashing or bogging down.
  • Posted on Oct 1, 05:42

    "Once everyone is on to two cores in a year or two, then we start talking about four cores."

    No, immediately - if you want to upgrade now and be relatively future proof for a while.
  • Posted on Oct 1, 04:52

    If you have to ask then you obviously don't need four cores. As far as games go probably not too many are multi-core ready, but for applications, there are quite a few that are now.
  • Posted on Sep 30, 07:21

    I agree, atm there are only a handful of applications that benefit from multiple cores and unless you work intensely with those specific programs, the additional cost doesn't seem justified.
  • Posted on Sep 29, 21:19

    The power drain will dim the lights and dent your paycheck when your electric bill arrives
  • Posted on Sep 28, 23:33

    What's the big deal about quad-core? How many of the games you play or apps you use actually know what to do with two-cores right now? It's all marketing. Once everyone is on to two cores in a year or two, then we start talking about four cores.
  • Posted on Sep 28, 14:56

    Wow, maybe I'll buy one of these. It's been a while and it's time for an upgrade :-)
Add your comments
  • 255 character limit.
  • If you wish to receive an email reply, please check this box
  • Name Email
  • Can we post your comment and/or question anonymously on this page (for anyone to read)?
  • Yes No

CSP in-house development of ASIC accelerators

AI chip market outlook 2023-2028: Insights from demand and supply perspectives

Automotive CIS tech development, 2024