Under intense competitive pressure from plummeting battery prices and aggressive Chinese market strategies,...
On May 22, China's Xiaomi launched its self-developed 3nm mobile system-on-chip (SoC), the XRing O1, making it just the fourth company worldwide, after...
South Korea panel maker business status
South Korea's two major panel makers have made progress in restructuring their businesses and will continue to strengthen OLED...
Trump reciprocal tariff impact on global industries
US President Donald Trump's implementation of reciprocal tariffs marked a significant shift in global trade dynamics and despite...
Global server supply chain status and analysis, 2023-2025
DIGITIMES conducted a thorough investigation of major Taiwanese and Chinese EMS providers' production sites, analyzing over...
Posted on Nov 12, 16:25
They should try getting a working 65nm quad-core first, don't you think?Posted on Nov 11, 17:53
They could do an Intel and package two chips together to give an 8 core almost straight away. Intel would be unable to answer that.Posted on Nov 10, 10:51
But lots of programs aren't even optimized for that many cores at the moment, so having 8 cores won't necessarily make AMD better off...Posted on Nov 10, 07:16
8-cores? It is already very costly to make "native" quad core it has been proven that there is no performance gain. How can AMD make 8-core CPU? a 560 mm^2 die?Posted on Nov 10, 00:35
ahahaha... too late... Nehalem can already do 8 cores and if you add in HT... that will be 16 cores = 16 threads...Plus... if AMD can't do 4 cores in a timely manner... How are you going to do 8 cores?
Posted on Nov 9, 01:10
If I was AMD I would just skip over quad-core's and go to 8 core's and make Intel play catch up. MHz is pretty much dead its going to be how many core's they can cram on to one chip and how many flops they can do.Posted on Nov 8, 23:10
Do we know how these hold up clock for clock against Core 2 parts?